H.P. Lovecraft’s legacy is complex, marked by his undeniable influence on horror literature and, unfortunately, by his deeply rooted racism. For contemporary readers, the name of his cat, often encountered in biographies or “The Rats in the Walls,” can be jarringly offensive. This immediate negative reaction is understandable and reflects today’s heightened awareness and reduced tolerance for racial slurs, a stark contrast to the social norms prevalent during Lovecraft’s time. This is akin to the discomfort many feel encountering racial epithets in classic literature like Mark Twain’s works.
The problematic nature of the cat’s name has led to editorial interventions in reprints of “The Rats in the Walls.” Publishers have, at times, opted to replace the original name with alternatives like “Blackie” or “Black Tom,” as seen in a 1956 issue of Zest magazine. These substitutions aim to preserve the essence of the name—likely referencing the cat’s dark fur—without perpetuating the racial offense.
The power of the n-word to inflict pain remains potent today. While evidence suggests Lovecraft did not intend the name as a malicious slur in the way it is understood now, this historical context does not diminish the word’s inherent offensiveness. Engaging with Lovecraft’s work, whether his fiction or biographical accounts, necessitates acknowledging the historical milieu in which he lived and wrote. These are uncomfortable historical realities that require individual reckoning. Language evolves, and words can accrue more offensive connotations over time.
It’s crucial to emphasize that contextualizing the cat’s name is not an attempt to excuse or minimize Lovecraft’s broader racism, which is evident in his personal writings and expressed prejudices. While the cat’s name might generate shock value and become a meme in contemporary internet culture, it’s arguably not the most impactful example of Lovecraft’s deeply ingrained and overtly expressed racism. Understanding the nuances of historical context allows for a more informed and critical engagement with Lovecraft’s problematic legacy.
